A Frame-based Characterisation of the Paraconsistent Well-founded Semantics with Explicit Negation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this work, we present Paraconsistent Well-Founded Semantics with eXplicit negation (WFSXp) by introducing a frame-based semantics. As far as we know, this is the first time that a declarative approach for WFSXp is effectively characterised in terms of a model theory. Dismissing usual techniques based on immediate consequence operators, our definition depicts WFSXp by minimising models satisfying particular criteria. Aware that WFSXp captures a large deal of logic programming semantics (including the main well-founded ones), our approach subsumes indirectly a semantics for them. Then assuming an illustrative tone, by adding some conditions, we also show how it can be adjusted to define Well-Founded Semantics with eXplicit negation (WFSX ), WellFounded Semantics (WFS) as well as Answer Sets. Given its declarative aspects, our work paves the way to define a logical representation of the family of well-founded semantics.
منابع مشابه
Default Negated Conclusions: Why Not?
We address the issue of the syntactical assymetry of logic programs: can one allow default negated literals in the heads ? This issue has been resolved positively, with full generality for the Stable Models based Answer Sets Semantics and, more recently, for the Well-founded Model based Static Semantics, for a wide class of programs. The work by Jonker also explores this issue for IMEX semantic...
متن کاملA Parameterised Hierarchy of Argumentation Semantics for Extended Logic Programming and its Application to the Well-founded Semantics
Argumentation has proved a useful tool in defining formal semantics for assumption-based reasoning by viewing a proof as a process in which proponents and opponents attack each others arguments by undercuts (attack to an argument’s premise) and rebuts (attack to an argument’s conclusion). In this paper, we formulate a variety of notions of attack for extended logic programs from combinations of...
متن کاملA Model Theory for Paraconsistent Logic Programming
We provide a nine-valued logic to characterize the models of logic programs under a paraconsistent well-founded semantics with explicit negation WFSX p. We define a truth-functional logic, NINE , based on the bilattice construction of Ginsberg and Fitting. The models identified by WFSX p are models of logic NINE . We conclude with a discussion on the conditions to obtain an isomorphism between ...
متن کاملAn Abductive Paraconsistent Semantics – MHP
In this paper we present a paraconsistent abdutive semantics for extended normal logic programs, the Paraconsistent Minimal Hypotheses semantics MHP . The MHP is a semantics of total paraconsistent models, that inherits the existence property of the abductive Minimal Hypotheses semantics MH [21], which is a semantics of total models, and the property of detection of support on contradiction of ...
متن کاملThe Abductive Paraconsistent Semantics MHp
In this paper we present a paraconsistent abdutive semantics for ELP , the paraconsistent minimal hypotheses semantics MHp. The MHp is a semantics of total paraconsistent models which combines the merits of two already existing semantics: it inherits the existence property of the abductive minimal hypotheses semantics MH, which is a semantics of total models, and the property of detection of su...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007